COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF RESULTS OF A TRADITIONAL AND LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF RESULTS OF A TRADITIONAL AND LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Nazarov F.N., Akhmedov A., Gulmuradov T.G.

Derartment of surgery of Kurgan-Tyube office of State educational establishment «Institute of postgraduate education in health sphere of Republic of Tajikistan», Kurgan-Tyube

Aim. Сomparative assessment of effectiveness of a traditional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a cloelithiasis.

Materials and methods. Under our observation over the period of 1997-2012 there were 1772 patients with acute and chronic calculous cholecystitis (a basic group with application of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy — 1462, control group with application of a traditional cholecystectomy — 310, men — 130, women — 1642).

All patients conducted complex examination: clinical analysis, radiological, ultrasonography, instrumental and mor­phological research.

Results. We carried out the comparative analysis of results of laparoscopic and traditional cholecystectomy. Complica­tions in a basic group: empyema (10,2%), edema of a gall bladder (7,8%), paravesical infiltrate (4,5%), phlegmon of a gall bladder (2,8%), and in control group: local peritonitis — 12%; empyema of a gall bladder — 11,1% and an edema of a gall bladder — 6,8%. Duration of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy was averaged by 42,3±3,2 minutes.

Intraoperative complications: bleeding from a vesical artery and a bubble bed (2,73%), a trauma of the choledochus (0,27%) and in 1 one case damage of a duodenum.

The average percentage of conversion was (5,7%). Conversion reasons: existence of the inflammatory infiltrate in a neck of a gall bladder (28,9%), extensive adherent process in an abdominal cavity (20,5%) and bleeding from a vesical artery and a bed of a gall bladder (19,3%), technical difficulties, a choledocholithiasis and fistula of choledochus-bladder.

Postoperative complications: wound suppuration, expiration of bile, bleeding, pancreatitis.

Lethality: at a laparoscopic cholecystectomy — 3 (0,21%), at traditional — 2 (0,65%).

Conclusion. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most rational way of surgical treatment of patients with cloelithiasis and its complications that is caused by less injury, a low percentage of complications, lethalities, reduction of terms and the material inputs on treatment and rehabilitation of patients.

REFERENCES

1. Artyimyan Yu. A. Endovideokhirurgiya pri ostrom kholetsistite i ego oslozhneniyakh [Endovideosurgery during acute cholecystitis and its complications]. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya — Endoscopic surgery, 2008, no. 5, pp. 52-54.

2. Bondarev A. A. Vozmozhnosti vypolneniya lapa-roskopicheskoy kholetsistektomii pri ostrom kholetsistite [Possibilities of laparoscopic cholecystectomy during acute cholecystitis]. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya — Endoscopic surgery, 2007, no. 2, pp. 11.

3. Vennik Yu. S., Miller S. V., Mukhin S. P., Vozmozhno-sti laparoskopicheskoy kholetsistektomii pri destruktivnom kholetsistite [Possibilities of laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a destructive cholecystitis]. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya -Endoscopic surgery, 2000, no. 2, pp. 17-18.

4. Voronin V. M. Ekonomicheskie preimushchestva videolaparoskopicheskoy khirurgii [Economic advantages of videolaparoscopic surgery]. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya -Endoscopic surgery, 2009, no. 1, pp. 39-40.

5. Gulmuradov T. G., Nazarov F. N., Babadzhanov D. S. [Comparative evaluation of the effects of conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. Materialy respublikan-skoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarod-nym uchastiem [Materials of scientific and practical confer­ence with international participation]. Tursunzade, 2007, pp. 27-29. (In Russ.)

6. Ermolov A. S., Abakumov M. M., Gulyaev A. A. Novye tekhnologii v lechenii ostrykh khirurgicheskikh zabolevaniy [New technologies in the treatment of acute surgical diseases]. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya — Endoscopic surgery, 2010, no. 3, pp. 34-35.

7. Ermolov. A.S., Upyrev A.V., Ivanov P.A. Khirurgiya zhelchkamennoy bolezni: ot proydennogo k nastoyashchemu [Surgery of cholelithiasis: from past to present]. Khirurgiya -Surgery, 2010, no. 5, pp. 4-9.

8. Nazarov F. N., Khakimov A. N., Kurbonov A. M. [Complications videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy]. Materialy XII Moskovskogo mezhdunarodnogo kongressa po endoskop-icheskoy khirurgii [Materials XII Moscow International Congress of Endoscopic Surgery]. Moscow, 2009, pp. 219-220. (In Russ.)

9. Nazarov F. N., Khakimov A. N., Kurbonov A. M. [Possibilities of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cho­lecystitis]. Materialy XII Moskovskogo mezhdunarodnogo kongressa po endoskopicheskoy khirurgii [Materials XII Moscow International Congress of Endoscopic Surgery]. Moscow, 2009, pp. 218-219. (In Russ.)

Комментарии

Back to Top