Аннотация

Цель
Conduct comparative estimation of efficiency of the using medical-preventive algorithm of parodontal nature beside persons with direct and mediated contact with bad production factors
Материал и методы
The study involved two groups of subjects: a production group consisting of 117 workers at an aluminum plant, and a local group consisting of 185 residents of an ecologically unfavorable zone near the plant. The age range of the participants was 25-50 years. During targeted screening, patients with early stages of periodontal pathology were identified. Chronic catarrhal gingivitis was diagnosed in 46 production workers and 68 local residents. To evaluate the effectiveness of various approaches to prevention and treatment, each group was divided into a main and a control subgroup. The main subgroup included 23 production workers and 34 local residents who were prescribed to a comprehensive program including: professional oral hygiene, training in toothbrushing techniques using a medium-hardness brush, and specialized Parodontax toothpaste. The duration of the treatment course was four weeks. The control subgroup (26 workers and 34 local residents) received a similar professional hygiene and training program but used regular hygienic toothpastes without therapeutic and preventive components and independently selected toothbrushes.
Результаты
The conducted study of dental health revealed significant differences between the groups of subjects. Particularly noteworthy is the fact that among persons having direct contact with production factors of the aluminum plant, chronic catarrhal gingivitis was diagnosed twice as often as among residents living in the adjacent area. When assessing the dental status of subjects of both groups, a high prevalence and intensity of the carious process was found, and these indicators demonstrated a stable tendency to increase with increasing age of the study participants. It is noteworthy that the survey demonstrated insufficient awareness of all study participants in matters of oral hygiene, which indicates the need to strengthen health education work among this contingent.
Заключение
The data obtained indicate the effectiveness of the active implementation of the therapeutic and preventive algorithm of a periodontal nature in patients of the main subgroup

Ключевые слова

parodontal disease prophylaxis gingivitis toothpaste cleaning teeth

Полный текст

Скачать статью в PDF

Полная версия статьи в формате PDF

Список литературы

  1. Гусейнова С.Т. Стоматологическая заболеваемость населения, проживающего в экологически неблагоприятном районе Баку. Клиническая стоматология. 2019;4(52):80–2.
  2. Журбенко В.А. Современные аспекты профилактики заболеваний пародонта. Высшая школа: научные исследования. Москва: Инфинити; 2022. p. 88–93.
  3. Кузьмина Э.М. Стоматологическая заболеваемость населения России. Москва; 2019. 236 p.
  4. Boutin A. Treatment of periodontal disease and prevention of preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2019;3:537–44.
  5. Lopez Del Valle L.M. Dental and periodontal health and treatment needs in a mother/child rural Puerto Rican population. Health Sci J. 2018;29(1):36–9.
  6. Retamal-Valdes B., Teughels W., Oliveira L.M. Clinical, microbiological, and immunological effects of systemic probiotics in periodontal treatment: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):283.
  7. Garg, S., Nasir, S. Comparative evaluation of oral hygiene status by using oral hygiene index, simplified oral hygiene index, and modified oral hygiene index: Revalidation of modified oral hygiene index. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2024;28(4):461-467. [https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_399_23](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_399_23)